Arbitration FAQs

1

What types of disputes does Mel typically arbitrate?

Mel arbitrates domestic and international commercial and business cases, technology implementation disputes, intellectual property and licensing matters, distribution and sales agreements, partnership and real estate conflicts. His background in both litigation and transactional work allows him to understand the legal and business implications at stake.


How does Mel manage arbitration efficiently?

2

He discourages unnecessary motions, manages scheduling proactively, and keeps the  process focused. Hearings move forward without delay, and parties receive timely, well reasoned decisions. Attorneys appreciate that he runs arbitration with discipline — without replicating the inefficiencies of litigation.


How does Mel approach decision-making as an arbitrator?

3

Mel listens carefully, evaluates the full evidentiary record, and issues clear, logically  structured decisions. He collaborates effectively on three-member panels and ensures that each party receives a full and fair opportunity to present its case. 


How does Mel handle evidentiary issues in arbitration?

4

He applies a practical approach. Evidence that is irrelevant or immaterial is excluded; evidence that may be inadmissible in court (e.g., hearsay) is often admitted and given appropriate weight later. His goal is fairness, completeness, and efficiency — not  procedural gamesmanship.


How does Mel protect confidentiality in arbitration?

5

Arbitration is private and treated by him as confidential unless the parties agree otherwise. Mel enforces confidentiality obligations consistently and ensures that all participants understand their responsibilities.


How does Mel handle collaborative decision-making on three-arbitrator panels?

6

Mel works cooperatively with fellow arbitrators, ensuring each perspective is considered. The goal is a thoughtful, well-supported award. Differences of opinion are discussed openly and professionally.


How does Mel respond to requests for rescheduling or procedural changes?

7

He is flexible when truly necessary but expects good cause for any postponement. He values efficiency and fairness for all parties and keeps the matter moving forward unless circumstances require deviation.


What do attorneys appreciate most about Mel as an arbitrator?

8

Attorneys value his fairness, organization, responsiveness, and well-reasoned awards. He maintains control of proceedings without overreaching, balances efficiency with due process, and communicates clearly throughout.